How often must a forklift risk assessment be reviewed in Singapore?

At least once every 3 years under regulation 7(1). It must also be reviewed and revised immediately, regardless of when the last review was, if either of two things happens: bodily injury to any person from exposure to a hazard in the workplace, or a significant change in work practices or procedures. Adding a new attachment, changing shift patterns or re-laying the racking are all significant changes.

How long must risk assessment records be kept in Singapore?

Not less than 3 years, under regulation 5(2) of the Workplace Safety and Health (Risk Management) Regulations. Regulation 5(1) also requires the record to be submitted to the Commissioner for Workplace Safety and Health when required. Failing to keep the record is a separate offence from failing to do the assessment, carrying a fine of up to $20,000, or up to $50,000 for a repeat offender.

What is the hierarchy of controls for forklift risks?

Regulation 4(1) requires all reasonably practicable steps to ELIMINATE a foreseeable risk first. Only where elimination is not reasonably practicable does regulation 4(2) allow you to minimise it, and regulation 4(3) lists the measures in order: substitution, engineering control, administrative control, then provision and use of suitable personal protective equipment. PPE is last, not first. A high-visibility vest is not a substitute for separating pedestrians from trucks.

Who must be told about the risks?

Regulation 6 requires all reasonably practicable steps to ensure that any person in the workplace who may be exposed to a risk is informed of the nature of that risk and of the control measures and safe work procedures put in place. That duty repeats every time the risk assessment is revised or a control measure changes, so it is not a one-off briefing at induction.

Does the risk assessment have to name who is responsible?

Yes. Regulation 4(4) requires the employer, self-employed person or principal to specify the roles and responsibilities of the persons involved in implementing each control measure or safe work procedure. A control with no name against it is not an implemented control, and this is one of the most common gaps in a forklift risk assessment.

Home / Blog / Forklift Risk Assessment

Forklift Risk Assessment in Singapore

Q: Is a forklift risk assessment compulsory in Singapore?

Yes. Regulation 3(1)(a) of the Workplace Safety and Health (Risk Management) Regulations requires the employer, self-employed person and principal to conduct a risk assessment for the safety and health risks posed to any person who may be affected by their undertaking in the workplace. If forklifts operate in your workplace they are part of that undertaking. Failing to conduct one is an offence under regulation 8(1) carrying a fine of up to $50,000, imprisonment of up to 2 years, or both.

If a forklift operates in your workplace, a risk assessment covering it is compulsory — and not doing one carries a fine of up to $50,000. This is what the law actually says, quoted, and what to write down.

The short version

Five duties sit in the Workplace Safety and Health (Risk Management) Regulations, and forklift work engages all five:

Do it. Conduct the risk assessment (reg 3).
Eliminate first, minimise second. PPE is last, not first (reg 4).
Write it down and keep it 3 years (reg 5).
Tell people, and tell them again every time it changes (reg 6).
Review at least every 3 years, and immediately after an injury or a significant change (reg 7).

Who has to do it

“In every workplace — the employer, self-employed person and principal shall conduct a risk assessment in relation to the safety and health risks posed to any person who may be affected by his undertaking in the workplace” WSH (Risk Management) Regulations, reg 3(1)(a)

Note “any person”, not “any employee”. A delivery driver, a contractor’s fitter, a customer walking to the office — if a forklift can reach them, they are inside the duty. Note “principal” too: engaging a contractor does not move the duty off you.

Eliminate before you minimise — the order is the law, not a preference

This is the part most forklift risk assessments get backwards.

“…shall take all reasonably practicable steps to eliminate any foreseeable risk to any person who may be affected by his undertaking in the workplace.” reg 4(1)(a)

Only where it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate the risk may you fall back on minimising it, and reg 4(3) then lists the measures in this order:

Order	Regulation 4(3)	What that looks like with a forklift
1	Substitution	Use a pallet truck or stacker where a counterbalance truck is not needed. Move goods at night when the floor is empty of people.
2	Engineering control	Physical separation of pedestrians and trucks: barriers, marked walkways, mirrors at blind corners, speed limiters, blue spot lights, restricted-access gates.
3	Administrative control	Traffic routes and one-way systems, a permit-to-work system, keys controlled so only trained operators can start a truck, the daily pre-use check, banned reversing zones.
4	PPE	High-visibility vests, safety boots. Last in the list, and the law puts it there for a reason.

A risk assessment whose only control is “operators to wear hi-vis” has started at step 4 and skipped the three that actually work. That is the single most common weakness we see.

The three numbers to remember

Number	What it is	Where it comes from
Every 3 years	Minimum review interval for the risk assessment	reg 7(1)
3 years	Minimum period the record must be kept	reg 5(2)
Up to $50,000	Fine for not doing the assessment, or not eliminating/minimising the risk — or up to 2 years’ imprisonment, or both	reg 8(1)

Failing on the paperwork duties — the record, informing people, the review — is a separate offence under reg 8(2): up to $20,000, rising to $50,000 for a repeat offender, or up to 2 years’ imprisonment, or both.

When you must redo it immediately, whatever the date says

Regulation 7(2) and 7(3) override the three-year clock. You must review and revise if:

“the occurrence of any bodily injury to any person as a result of exposure to a hazard in the workplace”; or
“a significant change in work practices or procedures”.

In a warehouse, “significant change” is doing a lot of work. Fitting an attachment, moving to a taller mast, re-laying racking into narrower aisles, adding a night shift, taking on a new product that needs a different handling method, changing from lead-acid to lithium and moving the charging point — each of those changes the hazards, and each restarts the duty.

The forklift hazards worth writing down

Generic templates produce generic assessments. These are the ones that actually appear in Singapore warehouses:

Pedestrians and trucks sharing floor. The big one. Reversing, blind corners, doorways where a walkway meets a truck route.
Loads that are not what the capacity plate assumed. Load centre, mast height and any attachment all reduce rated capacity — and the reduction is not obvious from the truck.
Suspended loads. Slinging from the forks engages a separate set of MOM criteria; see slinging a load from forklift forks.
Racking impact. A struck upright can fail later, not at the moment of impact. Damage inspection belongs in the assessment.
Battery charging. Lead-acid vents hydrogen while charging; ventilation and ignition sources belong in the assessment. See forklift battery maintenance.
Untrained or unfamiliar operators. A reach truck ticket is not a VNA ticket. MOM requires operators to be competent on the specific machine.
Poorly maintained trucks. Brakes, steering, horn, lights, seat switch and mast chains are all control measures that quietly stop working. This is where a maintenance contract does real safety work, not just mechanical work.
Loading bays and ramps. Trailer creep, unsecured dock plates, gradients.
Ground conditions. Potholes, spills, wet floors, the lip where indoor meets outdoor.

Two duties that are easy to miss

Name someone against every control. Regulation 4(4) requires the roles and responsibilities of the persons implementing each measure to be specified. “Mirrors to be installed” with nobody named is not an implemented control.

Re-brief whenever it changes. Regulation 6(2) makes the duty to inform repeat every time the assessment is revised or a measure changes. An induction three years ago does not discharge it.

What to do this week

Find the last risk assessment and check its date. More than three years old is already a breach of reg 7(1).
Check what changed since. New attachment, new racking layout, new shift, new truck? If yes, reg 7(2) required a revision at the time.
Read the controls column. If most of it is PPE and briefings, the order in reg 4(3) has been inverted.
Check every control has a name against it (reg 4(4)).
Confirm the record is filed and retrievable — reg 5(1) requires it to be produced to the Commissioner on request, and reg 5(2) requires 3 years’ retention.

Where we fit

We are a forklift company, not a safety consultancy, and we will not pretend otherwise. What we can tell you is the machine side of your assessment accurately: what a given truck and attachment are actually rated for, what its condition is, and which control measures on your list depend on the truck being maintained. Send us the models and we will tell you plainly.

Common Questions

Is a forklift risk assessment compulsory in Singapore?

Yes. Reg 3(1)(a) requires the employer, self-employed person and principal to conduct one for the risks posed to any person affected by their undertaking. Not doing one is an offence under reg 8(1): up to $50,000, up to 2 years’ imprisonment, or both.

How often must it be reviewed?

At least once every 3 years (reg 7(1)), and immediately after any bodily injury from a workplace hazard or any significant change in work practices or procedures (reg 7(3)).

How long must the record be kept?

Not less than 3 years (reg 5(2)), and it must be produced to the Commissioner when required (reg 5(1)).

Is a hi-vis vest enough?

No. Reg 4(1) requires you to try to eliminate the risk first, and reg 4(3) puts PPE last of four measures, after substitution, engineering control and administrative control.

Sources

Every legal statement on this page is quoted from the primary source, not from a summary. Read them yourself:

Workplace Safety and Health (Risk Management) Regulations (Rg 8) — Singapore Statutes Online, Attorney-General’s Chambers. Regulations 3 to 8: the duty to assess, the order of controls, records, informing people, the review interval and the penalties. Read 30 August 2026, version current as at that date.
Workplace Safety and Health Act 2006 — Singapore Statutes Online. The Act these Regulations are made under.

This page explains what the Regulations say. It is not legal advice, and where your situation turns on a detail you should check with MOM or your own adviser.